Vote the ICO

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
close overlay logo
Author: Kasey Flynn
Read time: 
4 min

USDT ERC-20 vs. BEP-20: Choosing the Correct Network for Deposits

Ethereum coin on yellow background

Many people are trying out cryptocurrency these days, and USDT is fast gaining popularity. However, that sometimes causes confusion for new users.

USDT looks like a single asset, but it behaves like a family of assets, depending on the network you choose. The moment an exchange shows a network dropdown, you are not picking a “fee option.” You are picking a ledger. That decision determines where the transaction is recorded, which explorer can verify it, and which receiving service can actually detect it. This is why people get confused about USDT ERC20 and BEP20. The token name stays constant, but the rails underneath it change. The trap is familiar address shapes: a 0x address can point to Ethereum, but it can also exist on other EVM networks.

The Network Picker Is Not Decoration

Use a three-part model: asset, network, destination support. The asset is USDT. The network is the chain you select at send time. Destination support is the exact chain and token standard that the receiver is prepared to monitor and credit.

ERC-20 usually means USDT issued on Ethereum using the ERC-20 token standard. BEP-20 usually means USDT on BNB Smart Chain using the BEP-20 standard. Other versions exist, but the big idea stays the same: “USDT” is the asset, not the route. 

On exchanges, the network may appear as ERC-20, Ethereum, or ETH, but they all mean the Ethereum rail. Exchanges surface networks as a dropdown because you are choosing the route. If the destination supports only one route for USDT, you must match it exactly.

It’s easy to understand this in the abstract, but some people still find it confusing when they come to put it into practice. That’s why learning how real destinations communicate what they will and will not credit is so important. Let’s look at a real example.

On the Help Portal inside Lucky Rebel Casino, the deposit guidance states that ETH and USDT must be sent through ERC-20, and it explicitly notes that networks such as Polygon, Base, and BSC are not accepted for those deposits. This is not a random restriction. It is a clear statement of what ledger the platform is monitoring for those assets. 

It also teaches a subtle but important lesson: address shape is not proof of network. A 0x address can exist across multiple EVM chains, but a deposit is only “real” for the receiver on the chain it is set up to watch. In that sense, Lucky Rebel Casino works as a reference point for what good deposit instructions look like: specific, unambiguous, and aligned to the rail the receiver can actually recognize.

Why Some Sites Only Accept USDT On ERC-20

Supporting USDT across multiple chains is not just “adding another option.” Each chain has its own confirmation behavior, tooling, and accounting assumptions. If a destination credits ERC-20 USDT, it is watching Ethereum confirmations and matching deposits against Ethereum transaction history. If it credits BEP-20 USDT, it is watching BNB Smart Chain. These are separate ledgers with separate histories, even when the address format looks similar.

That is why “USDT network” is a loaded phrase. People think they are choosing a cheaper route, but they are actually choosing a different chain. When a platform says “ERC-20 only,” it is describing the single ledger it uses for USDT deposits, not a preference or a branding choice.

Can I Send USDT On Polygon To An ERC-20 Address?

If you select Polygon as the network, your transfer is recorded on Polygon. Even if the destination address starts with 0x and resembles an Ethereum address, it is still not an ERC-20 transfer on Ethereum. For the destination to credit it automatically, it would need to support USDT on Polygon and to monitor that chain for deposits.

The safest way to phrase the goal is: you are not sending “to an ERC-20 address,” you are sending on Ethereum. The network choice is the deciding factor, not the characters you paste. That is why exchanges make you pick a network and often show warnings when a destination states a specific standard.

If you want a broader refresher on how wallets work, this crypto wallet overview is a useful companion read when you are moving between multiple networks in the same week.

USDT Sent On The Wrong Network: What Happens Now?

When the selected network does not match what the destination supports, the most common outcome is straightforward: the destination does not automatically register the deposit, even though the withdrawal has left your exchange. The transaction exists, but it exists on the chain you used, not on the chain the receiver is monitoring for that asset.

Whether a mismatched deposit can be recovered depends on how the destination manages deposit addresses and whether it supports that chain operationally. Some platforms can assist in specific cases, while others cannot. The habit that prevents the mismatch is consistent: read the destination’s supported network note, then mirror it in your exchange’s network selector before you hit send. USDT is stable in value by design, but it is not uniform in where it lives. ERC-20 and BEP-20 are different rails, and the right choice is the one that the destination supports without interpretation.

Disclaimer

“This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Please do your own research before investing.”

Share This Article

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Clarius One - Marketing for crypto - Click here to book a call